| Author |
Message |
| < Watch out...hes got a little dog. But it's very angry. |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:06 am
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Location: New Latveria
|
|
You make me sad.
-Ego Boost for FWS-
*Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers*
That's right, I cower at your trolling majesty. _________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:23 am
|
|
|
Caffiene Junkie
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 452
|
|
| Skulltower wrote: |
You make me sad.
-Ego Boost for FWS-
*Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers**Cowers*
That's right, I cower at your trolling majesty. |
What are you talking about now? Have you been drinking...?
Oh wait no, this is your -sober- form... |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:50 am
|
|
|
Forgotten Horror
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2531
Location: Outer Space
|
|
| Oh wow... the wit... i can feel it from here... oh wait, thats just my stomach growling at me for not eating since i got up. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:53 am
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Location: New Latveria
|
|
| FinalWhiteStar wrote: |
What are you talking about now? Have you been drinking...?
Oh wait no, this is your -sober- form... |
Oh I say, old boy. Did you manage to come up with that on your own? Or was it one of your pseudo-intellectual friends who think Adolf Hitler was "punk rock" jotting it down on a table napkin for you at whatever cafe it is you retards congregate to when you don't have school the next day so you wouldn't forget.
Fucking plebian. _________________
Last edited by Skulltower on Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:55 am
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| Skulltower wrote: |
| FinalWhiteStar wrote: |
What are you talking about now? Have you been drinking...?
Oh wait no, this is your -sober- form... |
Oh I say, old boy. Did you manage to come up with that on your own? Or was it one of your pseudo-intellectual friends who think Adolf Hitler was "punk rock" jotting it down on a table napkin for you at whatever cafe it is you retards congregate to when you don't have school the next day so you wouldn't forget.
Fucking pleabian. |
420 yeeeh hehe _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:58 am
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Location: New Latveria
|
|
422
D'oh!
FWS, you make this too easy, man! Just stop and pick yourself a more vulnerable and submissive partner to troll with. I understand you need something to masturbate to before you go to bed but Christ, this is getting dry. _________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:12 pm
|
|
|
Caffiene Junkie
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 452
|
|
| Skulltower wrote: |
| FinalWhiteStar wrote: |
What are you talking about now? Have you been drinking...?
Oh wait no, this is your -sober- form... |
Oh I say, old boy. Did you manage to come up with that on your own? Or was it one of your pseudo-intellectual friends who think Adolf Hitler was "punk rock" jotting it down on a table napkin for you at whatever cafe it is you retards congregate to when you don't have school the next day so you wouldn't forget.
Fucking pleabian. |
Seriously, you aren't making any sense. Even the word "pleb" means a person. So your saying im a person? Come on Skulltower... |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:15 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 66
|
|
I think FWS just owned him. _________________ H.C. Trouble is the king of flaming. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:23 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| Palooka wrote: |
| I think FWS just owned him. |
Well duh, FWS is quick on his feet. You have to be when as a child you were in constant threat of you war-hero grandfather coming to fuck you. In whats where he incidentally fucked people who looked like you as practice. Only a true grandfather fucker like FWS can own like that.
this getting old yet FWS? _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:27 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Location: New Latveria
|
|
Oh ye of simple mind...
ple·be·ian Audio pronunciation of "plebeian" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pl-bn)
adj.
1. Of or relating to the common people of ancient Rome: a plebeian magistrate.
2. Of, belonging to, or characteristic of commoners.
3. Unrefined or coarse in nature or manner; common or vulgar: plebeian tastes.
n.
1. One of the common people of ancient Rome.
2. A member of the lower classes.
3. A vulgar or coarse person.
You are number two. Plebian. Good luck when you get to college, man, seriously.
Edit: You are number two & number three. _________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:30 pm
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
I only have issue with the following:
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| Making any comments whatsoever about your opponents age: What the hell is this. "HEY you jackass..................YOUR YOUNG"! What the fuck? Are they going to explode with anguish because you just said they're a kid. This is weak and idiotic. All your really doing is saying the person who is obviously using better flaming tactics than you is younger than you are. Thereby making your impending defeat even more pathetic. |
Let's face it, some kid participating in an online flame war is no doubt an Acne with angst and just hasn't grown up. I'd say most flamers haven't developed past the Acne phase, either. Don't get your pants all pissy-wet, kids. _________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:22 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| pangit wrote: |
I only have issue with the following:
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| Making any comments whatsoever about your opponents age: What the hell is this. "HEY you jackass..................YOUR YOUNG"! What the fuck? Are they going to explode with anguish because you just said they're a kid. This is weak and idiotic. All your really doing is saying the person who is obviously using better flaming tactics than you is younger than you are. Thereby making your impending defeat even more pathetic. |
Let's face it, some kid participating in an online flame war is no doubt an Acne with angst and just hasn't grown up. I'd say most flamers haven't developed past the Acne phase, either. Don't get your pants all pissy-wet, kids. |
Yah but your missing the point. Im not saying there are no kids. Im saying using that as a tactic is idiotic and ineffective regardless. _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:33 pm
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| pangit wrote: |
I only have issue with the following:
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| Making any comments whatsoever about your opponents age: What the hell is this. "HEY you jackass..................YOUR YOUNG"! What the fuck? Are they going to explode with anguish because you just said they're a kid. This is weak and idiotic. All your really doing is saying the person who is obviously using better flaming tactics than you is younger than you are. Thereby making your impending defeat even more pathetic. |
Let's face it, some kid participating in an online flame war is no doubt an Acne with angst and just hasn't grown up. I'd say most flamers haven't developed past the Acne phase, either. Don't get your pants all pissy-wet, kids. |
Yah but your missing the point. Im not saying there are no kids. Im saying using that as a tactic is idiotic and ineffective regardless. |
Is it a "tactic," then, to make an honest observation and draw an obvious conclusion from someone's fundamental immaturity? You could have differentiatiated, but you didn't. Why not point out that an opponent is undoubtedly a waste of time to address because of the glaring immaturity? I'd say arguing with a brat is time lost. Do you like arguing with wussy babies? I know a lot of people here like to pick fights with nobodies and absolute strangers, but why waste time with someone that doesn't even have a fully developed perspective about his/herself? _________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:10 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| pangit wrote: |
Is it a "tactic," then, to make an honest observation and draw an obvious conclusion from someone's fundamental immaturity? You could have differentiatiated, but you didn't. Why not point out that an opponent is undoubtedly a waste of time to address because of the glaring immaturity? I'd say arguing with a brat is time lost. Do you like arguing with wussy babies? I know a lot of people here like to pick fights with nobodies and absolute strangers, but why waste time with someone that doesn't even have a fully developed perspective about his/herself? |
You twist my words. What I said has nothing to do with someones fundamental immaturity. Someone could be of any age and still be quite mature [edit: or immature for that matter] . I am speaking of imbeciles calling people children soley because they are arguing with them. If you point out that someone is acting in an immature manner because they are than I see no problem with that. As was mentioned in the following replies to my initial post these are useless tactics not because they are not in any case valid. But because they have been so overused and misused so as to have lost all impact.
Also what has anything I said have anything to do with whom you choose to or not to argue with. Again im speaking of being irritated with tactics people use. That is all. I find them to be weak and without any real ability to affect a half decent opponent. Im not sure where you got the rest of this from. _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:25 pm
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
You twist my words. What I said has nothing to do with someones fundamental immaturity. Someone could be of any age and still be quite mature [edit: or immature for that matter] . I am speaking of imbeciles calling people children soley because they are arguing with them. If you point out that someone is acting in an immature manner because they are than I see no problem with that. As was mentioned in the following replies to my initial post these are useless tactics not because they are not in any case valid. But because they have been so overused and misused so as to have lost all impact.
Also what has anything I said have anything to do with whom you choose to or not to argue with. Again im speaking of being irritated with tactics people use. That is all. I find them to be weak and without any real ability to affect a half decent opponent. Im not sure where you got the rest of this from. |
I'm simply tired of immaturity. Note that I agreed with you about all your other complaints. I differ with you in that I believe all those poor tactics you outlined have all to do with someone's immaturity. _________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:29 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| pangit wrote: |
I'm simply tired of immaturity. Note that I agreed with you about all your other complaints. I differ with you in that I believe all those poor tactics you outlined have all to do with someone's immaturity. |
Being tired of immaturity is understandable. Im wondering what it has to do with what I posted directly. Yes I agree in all of these tactics have to do with someones immaturity. But are you then stating that to simply screech someones a stupid child, or an idiot teenager is not immature. Throwing someones immaturity in their face fine. That is not the same as saying "your an acne ridden child", or "you are too young to understand (blah)".
So really im not sure what part of my initial post you actually disagree with. _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:36 pm
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
| pangit wrote: |
| I differ with you in that I believe all those poor tactics you outlined have all to do with someone's immaturity. |
_________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:56 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| Yes I agree in all of these tactics have to do with someones immaturity. |
My initial thread doesn't say any of them don't. This has nothing to do with you initial statement in reference to what I wrote originally. _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:04 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 18
|
|
Another strategification I can't tolerate is peonspeak think. Word positioning of challenge vocabulations in such a mannerism that teh meaning intended to be conveyed is clear it is somenoun nobody can do without looking pedantic.
Omnivox communication requires obscure colloqualism or the clarity of your epistole might be parsed into infothink and anyone could understandify it. Troglodytes.
Transport back to your fortressified barracks and obfiliate your location, cowards. BawlHal is for pinnacle acmes. _________________ Psychopathy is grossly misunderstood, FAGS!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:05 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 18
|
|
Ah, I amore teh odorsense of hypocrisy in the antemedian. I inhale it from my torso limb pits. _________________ Psychopathy is grossly misunderstood, FAGS!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:31 pm
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
Senor Salsa wrote:
Yes I agree in all of these tactics have to do with someones immaturity.
My initial thread doesn't say any of them don't. This has nothing to do with you initial statement in reference to what I wrote originally. |
Let's have a look at my initial statement, then:
| pangit wrote: |
I only have issue with the following:
| Senor Salsa wrote: |
| Making any comments whatsoever about your opponents age: What the hell is this. "HEY you jackass..................YOUR YOUNG"! What the fuck? Are they going to explode with anguish because you just said they're a kid. This is weak and idiotic. All your really doing is saying the person who is obviously using better flaming tactics than you is younger than you are. Thereby making your impending defeat even more pathetic. |
Let's face it, some kid participating in an online flame war is no doubt an Acne with angst and just hasn't grown up. I'd say most flamers haven't developed past the Acne phase, either. Don't get your pants all pissy-wet, kids. |
You presented them as separate tactics. My initial statement about your post was actually that calling someone immature was a fair enough statement to use, considering that flamers are exactly that. All the other tactics you outlined are just fluff, and branch off from the fact that flamers are immature. _________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:06 pm
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
Ok let me see if I can straighten this out. Your saying if some retard comes on here flaming in an immature manner, there is nothing wrong with calling him immature.
I agree. There is nothing wrong with calling him immature.
Yes each tactic I presented was seperate from each other. But I consider each one to be immature, and stupid, and worthless. You think "again he doesn't get why im disagreeing." But please note one thing. Saying that a moron who is acting immature is in fact acting immature is NOT the same thing as calling some flamer you met a stupid child, or an acne ridden teenager (i know i stated this previously im restating it for emphasis). So what I don't get is how my first post is in any way whatsoever related to calling someone immature. IT never mentions the word. It only implies fault in calling someone a child, or saying their age (NOT maturity) alone is enough to damn them as a flamer.
I would again like to restate my intent with this post. These are tactics (including the first one) I feel are misused, and used way too often by flamers to inneffectively attack others.
So what is it in that first tactic that you disagree with? (I am not attempting to be condecening, only to assertain what the heck is in error in my original post).
Or to be less wordy let me sum it up in this question: Do you feel that when engaging an opponent in argument, it is ok (under no specific circumstances) to call them a stupid child, or let us say "too young to know what they are talking about"? _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:19 am
|
|
|
Blowhard
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Through the glass, darkly.
|
|
If some flamer admits to being younger, and is obvisouly acting like a ninny brat, then what's wrong in stating the obvious (aside from the fact that the accuser would be stating the obvious)? _________________ Ang pangit mo! |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:40 am
|
|
|
I am..
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 428
Location: Fuck you
|
|
| pangit wrote: |
| If some flamer admits to being younger, and is obvisouly acting like a ninny brat, then what's wrong in stating the obvious (aside from the fact that the accuser would be stating the obvious)? |
What is wrong with it is that it is weak and ineffective. Again the tactics I mention aren't hated because of their justified use, but because of their incorrect use.
The youth one in question (im glad we got immature tossed out the window), annoys me most because it is used constantly without reason. You disagree with an opponent, they state your entire forum is made up of "angsty pimply teeny-boppers".
Obviously if it were only used when justified I would have no issue (as I don't with numerous tactics not overdone). My post however is describing tactics which are in all cases abused tremendously and have therefore lost all impact.
It isn't if calling someone a child is wrong (in a moral or factually incorrect sense), it is about if calling them a child anymore will even get a flinch. _________________
I had to kill Bob Morton because he made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake. |
|
|
|
 |
|