| Author |
Message |
| < 20 new Flame Warriors |
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:43 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
OK, 19 new warriors and 1 new weapon.
Amnesiac
Amnesiac functions in two main ways: claiming not to remember ever having said what she said, and claiming to have never seen a crucial post from another poster. If another warrior has anything unwholesome to say about her past posting, Amnesiac will claim helplessly not to recall having written an offending message of the type described. When Archivist is battling her and produces the incriminating post, Amnesiac will argue that it is out of context or that if she can't even remember it it is so far in the past that it should be dropped. Should a warrior who is fighting her make a post with conclusive proof of his side and refer to that post, she will swear she never read such a post. This technique works only on folder and email message fora. Her opponent may then recapitulate the thesis of his post, but Amnesiac will either say she still disremembers or ignore the recap. Her opponent will then go to the last resort of reposting the original argument, and when he asks later why she did not respond to the repost, she will asseverate that she has never seen his repost. By now Amnesiac's credibility in the eeys of the forum is completely shot, but she remains smug in her iron guarding from being surely vanquished. Amnesiac is one of the few warriors beyond the reach of ownage, forever keeping herself from having to admit defeat.
Big Monkey
Big Monkey exists only to ape the other participants in the discussion forum. On a psychic forum, for instance, he may fret, "I think my aura's turning green, then pink, then burgundy with yellow polka dots. Can you please help me?" On a dream interpretation forum, he'll ask, "I had a dream that everyone on this site was having a party, and they were sitting around drinking beer, when all of a sudden a big purple dragon named Larry fell out of the sky and squashed them all. What does it mean?" On a teen board, he will post excessively angsty reflections on the course of his day to caricature the other participants' style. Although monkey-do is monkey-see, the other users can humor him by throwing him a diversionary banana, and thereby gain a new friend and convert to their forum.
Broken Record
Broken Record advances her little factoids again and again. Other netizens have lost count of the number of times she has brought up that her daughter likes to listen to the Backstreet Boys, or that she was born the year Neil Armstrong landed on the moon, or that she once ran into her twin sister while visiting a Wendy's in Detroit. Broken Record's ramblings resemble a perpetual montage of cut-and-paste jobs from old posts. She may be suffering amnesia, as if another warrior complains about her repetitious blatherings, she will claim not to recall the first, second, third or fourth time she mentioned whatever. Occasionally Archivist will revive a matching post she made earlier just to embarrass her. Although annoying enough to be killfiled, Broken Record is quite harmless.
Cocktail
Like Grenade, Cocktail is a weapon rather than an actual warrior. This weapon is detonated under rather benign circumstances, but can soon turn the forum into flames. Cocktail is initially deployed not to bash another forum member, nor to deflect attention Grenade-style from a topic in a battle, nor to get a well-needed rant out of one's system, but simply to make conversation. Cocktail will be introduced when, in a moment of forum boredom, one partygoer will entertain the forum by saying, "Hey! Why don't we have a debate about abortion?" The circle will then start a debate all in fun, but Cocktail can have blurring, sickening side effects as the disagreements soon evolve into aspersions of cretinism, dramatically shocked cries of "How could you write that?" and accusations of being treasonous, murderous, un-American or Hitlerian. Although almost all warrior types are trained in handling it, Debate Club, Lonely Guy and Troller have a particular proclivity for using Cocktail. Smart Admins will outlaw the use, sale or manufacture of Cocktails in their forum.
Curtain-closer
Curtain-closer wants to close the curtains on the theater that is Internet flame warring. A sort of wet blanket to flame wars, she cannot stand self-righteous flaming, black-and-white ultimatums, ipsedixitistic declarations, moralistic grandstanding, narcissistic e-screaming, easy Nazi/Hitler comparisons, antiauthoritarian slogans, preachy citation of the Bible, Constitution or Martin Niemöller, or emo self-pity threads. Curtain-closer often finds herself throat-to-throat with histrionic-tongued warriors like Acne, Artful Dodger, Deacon, Klaxon, Rebel Without a Clue and Yippie. Often rather than attack the substance of a post, she will criticize its melodramatic form. While experienced warriors know that her demands of "Tone down the rhetoric!" are just a stall made out of hope that her opponent will self-destruct, the more unawares can get sidetracked with arguments about the style of their posts.
Debate Club
Debate Club is just itching to debate, and she's sure to pull you and everyone else into it. Debate Club will research her topic just to increase the experience of Internet debate, and mull over the pros or the cons (whichever side she's chosen) of the subject. Battling for the joy of battling, she will pick a side -- any side -- and give it her all to make a case for it. She will gleefully point out her opponent's logical fallacies, and identify them by their Latin names. Her ability to stay in the battle ring even while being crushed rivals that of Palooka. As her battle goes on, Debate Club will become increasingly annoying and peculiarly defensive of her side, but tell her opponent that it's his opinion and he has a right to it. Often the battle will culminate in Debate Club admitting that she doesn't really believe in what she was arguing, and explaining that she just likes the experience of forensics.
Epicophobe
Remember that kid in your class who screamed when the teacher handed out copies of War and Peace? He's matured into Epicophobe and found himself onto a forum near you. Epicophobe cannot stand responses that run into 300 words or more, but the longer, the worse. Epicophobe's complaints about "scroll fatigue" are just a rationalization of his own laziness. Epicophobe's talking, nay, outright bragging about how he didn't read a long post fails to win him any respect from the forum, but the less serious members such as Evil Clown and Jerk can come to his defense. Much like Grunter, he can blow warriors like Philosopier or Profundus Maximus up with fury after all the effort they put into their post goes to waste because he refuses to read it. Kung-fu Master is immune to Epicophobe attacks and can save the day for Epicophobe's opponents.
Gerrymander
Gerrymander insists upon setting down the ground rules for the battle, and draws the lines so that he wins and you lose. You know, SHOUTING hurts your argument, you must spell every word correctly (which I can do and you can't), you can't win if you call me a Nazi, citing material from magazines X, Y and Z hurts your credibility, and you can only win on days of the week beginning with T.
The Grey Menace
Always prone to see the grey where there is none, the Grey Menace is lurking in the background to effectively create a forum without opinions. He will typically make the case that these are subtle, complex issues that require a fuzzily defined meditation and introspection to fully comprehend. Any time anyone states that anybody is wrong, the Grey Menace will jump in to lecture that there are two (or more) sides to every controversy, and will not get off her back until she recants her opinion that so-and-so is wrong. Resolute in his mission to convince others that with every conflict there is no one side in the right, the Grey Menace ultimately finds himself defending Klansmen, Islamic terrorists and Holocaust apologists. Occasionally he will descend into battle with another warrior, and despite his spurning his opponent's belief that everyone is either in agreement with her or in the wrong, the Grey Menace will argue his side to the death, without noticing the contradiction. The Grey Menace can be an annoying, insidiously powerful warrior.
Hitler Youth
15 going on 50, Hitler Youth is outspoken in his opposition to youth emancipation and to cultural freedom in general. He stalwartly defends rules on the forum and in society at large, standing up for authority, tradition, taboos and, in general, the status quo. He glorifies current laws and vilifies civil disobedience. He will find allies in Netiquette Nazi, and, à la Uncle Tom, in Life Experience. Hitler Youth believes that arguing that he is not mature enough to drink a margarita or stay out after his town's designated curfew hour will impress older forum members, and, paradoxically, paint him with an aura of maturity. He will never make a passing reference to Blink-182, Hot Topic, raves, freak dancing, sideways baseball caps, MySpace, slitting your wrists or other trends of the young without reassuring the forum members that he is not fond of these. Hitler Youth is abhorred with a biting passion by Acne, liberal Ideologue, Rebel Without a Clue and of course Yippie (whom he accuses of not being grown-up). CAUTION: Enfant Provocateur will sometimes pose as Hitler Youth just to get a rise out of people.
Life Experience
To gain the upper hand in battle, Life Experience uses her age as a trump card. She claims as an adult to have that elusive thing that her youthful opponents lack, and will therefore know more than they do about the issue at hand. Her logic is that she has been around longer, seen a lot, had hard knocks, raised children and had to become responsible by paying bills, and therefore her views are informed and rigit and her opponents' views uninformed and wrong. Although Life Experience of course pulls her warrior cards atop the table in debates over youth rights issues like the voting age, school uniforms, parental authority and underage drinking, she will make a divine invocation of the sequence of numbers in her birthdate in fighting over any issue where a generation gap fuels the divide, such as drug legalization, anti-globalization, animal rights, intellectual property, profanity in rock and rap, corporations making their employees wear suits and ties, protestors' rights or whether the War on Iraq was an oil war. One of her favorite claims is "You'll agree with me when you're older". Toxic Granny will call her "whippersnapper", but she never takes the hint. Even the most determined high school and college students find themselves unable to scale the steep mountain when battling Life Experience's exclusionism, and if they are Tireless Rebutters they may find themselves at the verge of self-destructing, or becoming Filibuster by attacking her technique again and again. However, once a middle-class 55-year-old who takes the same side as the kids comes along, Life Experience's proverbial jig is up.
The Lone Ranter
One clear morning, the Lone Ranter will join the forum and immediately start a new thread with a long post. Perhaps the assertions in his post will be questionable, or maybe the connection and causality of thoughts will be schizophrenic, or possibly the writing style will be something to make Strunk & White balk, but the Lone Ranter will seem proud of his output. Warriors ranging from Issues to Philosopher will jump in to respond with rebuttals, agreements and elaborations, but the Lone Ranter will never write back. Sometimes the post is his only one, but sometimes as the days pass he will post more of his ruminations, all without ever acknowledging the existence of the other warriors and their replies. Eventually the Lone Ranter will exhaust his topics of discussion, and in his barely noted absence he will leave only a silver bullet behind.
Martian
Big band music is coming miraculously back into fashion? The Baby Boomers sided with the Establishment in the 1960s? Ishtar is widely considered one of the greatest movies ever made? Most bookstores won't let you browse at their books without buying them? Punk died out in the 1980s? With his understanding of Earth and its culture and history, Martian leaves you wondering what color the sky is in his world. It is unclear whether he has been on LSD and psilocybin all his adult life, or is suffering from schizophrenia, or has spent all his life in an extreme backwoods area, or is indeed, like a Man in Black, a visitor from another planet trying dodgily to fit in. Source-staller will demand a source for his statements, as she always does, but this time she has a point. Martian's detachment from anything we know makes him beyond the reach of conventional fighting tactics, but if warriors can dig up facts to prove his schema of the world wrong, Martian will vanish from the forum to take a trip back to where he can see Phobos and Deimos with the naked eye.
Mirrors
Mirrors use their ideological partnership to build a fortress of collective identity. Each member of a group of Mirrors is in such borg-like agreement with the others that they appear interchangeable to the outsider. There is seldom any dissent or difference of opinion among the Mirrors, and when there is, they are all too willing to let it aside to fight a common enemy. A classic Mirrors maneuver is to set the opponent up by each making unpalatable statements that discombobulate the opposition. If they are battling a pro-choicer, for instance, Joe may say, "You want to take babies from their mothers and crush their heads!", Larry may threaten, "You will burn in Hell, baby-killer!", Josh may msue, "Mmmmm . . . roast fetus smothered in gravy . . .", Mark may ask, "So how many babies have YOU aborted today?" and Frank may add, "The next time someone bombs an abortion clinic, I hope you're inside!" The Mirrors will NEVER call one another on their statements, no matter how out of line they are. However, they will cautiously avoid explicitly expressing agreement with the others' posts. Then, when raised to a state of rage by Frank, their pro-choice nemesis mixes up her opponents and cans him with, "Well, what can I expect when you're such a disgusting person you think I want to take babies from their mothers and crush their heads?", Frank will bounce back with, "*I* never said that! Stop accusing me of saying things I never said! You clearly have a chip on your shoulder," etc. These crafty attacks of discreditation make Mirrors a group of foes not to be meddled with.
Paycheck
Fiscally responsible and hard-working but not socially conscious, Paycheck voices the built-up frustration of the working man. He will often vent by grousing openly about his squalid working conditions and the long hours he endures to make ends meet. This allows him to get some air off, but also serves as a mechanism to make himself look more grounded than his opponent. He is irked by battles or Grenades packed with such topics as social norms, the evils of authority and hierarchism, civil disobedience, presidential misconduct, animal rights, Israel vs. Palestine or saving the mountain gorillas -- if it doesn't pay the bills, he doesn't want to hear about it. This tendency gets him on Issues' bad side. Paycheck has a dyed-in-the-wool loathing for academics, bohemians, nouveaux riches, the old rich, upper-middle-class college kids, overpaid celebrities and multimillionaire athletes. In contempt of these people, on and off the message board, Paycheck will often declare that they are not living in "the real world". Android will point out that the world these individuals inhabit is just as physically existent as Paycheck's, but Paycheck won't have it. He is greatly feared by Weenie.
Polysemist
One of the accidents of the evolution of the English language has been its multitude of meanings for the same word, so that "fly" can mean an insect of the order Diptera, slang for cool, or something you don't want to be caught with open. Polysemist uses this phenomenon in battle every chance he gets. By his willful misinterpretations and reinterpretations, he believes he will be able to snappily discredit the opponent. If, for example, on an Islamic forum, someone curious as to whether he is a Sunni or Shi'ite asks him exactly what sect he belongs to, Polysemist will rebuff with "I don't belong to any sect. This isn't a cult forum, dear." Should an opponent, thinking him odd, say that something about him is "queer", Polysemist will stand up to aver his heterosexuality and attempt to win the battle with threats of a libel suit for insinuating that he was gay. Although other warriors will quickly jump to correct Polysemist's interpretations, his disingenuous snap-backs give him a few cheap shots and the temporary visage of an upper hand.
Scavenger
Scavenger scrounges around for dead conversations in the vast desert of the forum. Once a thread that has had no signs of life for days has been found, he can thoroughly eviscerate the other participants by advancing a killer argument in the thread. Due to the decay of the thread, no one else except perhaps Tireless Rebutter, Necromancer or Archivist will take an interest in leashing a counterattack. Having the last word, Scavenger declares himself the victor. Glory is evanescent, though, as the thread desiccates after a few days and Scavenger must circle the skies for other carrion.
Source-staller
Source-staller specializes in defensive attacks to prolong the battle. Once another warrior makes his case, she will roll up like a pillbug and demand academic, peer-reviewed, published sources for the facts that underlie his argument. There is no aspect of human nature so universally known, no meme of pop psychology so widespread, no social generalization so obvious, that Source-staller will not demand a source for it. Source-staller loves so much to put off her defeat that she will even insist upon citations for facts that are not crucial or even relevant to the argument. She may occasionally try an offensive attack, but most of the time she can be seen curled up in her shell. If no references can be found, she will, much like Nitpick, gloat that her opponent was unable to substantiate his claim. If her opponent DOES supply a source, she will inevitably opine that there is no way the data-gatherers could know for sure they were right, is there?
Yippie
Yippie doesn't trust anyone over 30, and he's not the least bit shy about expressing this attitude online. He is always ready to throw a pie in the face of the Establishment, which he vituperates for its "government schools", and never misses an opportunity to poison the well of older posters. Yippie will often post rants accusing Baby Boomers of hypocrisy and excoriating their generation for its metamorphosis from ganja-smoking Flower Children who lambasted Nixon to greedy Reaganites and Bushites in suits who trade civil liberties for security. He will wax prodigious on the importance of lowering the voting age, abolishing gulag schools and protecting students' rights, but never credit the generation who had these ideas first before the Bittersweet Generation took the mantle. Yippie is mortal enemies with Life Experience, and the two will fight each other to the death. Should other warriors stab him into battle, he will knock them over the head with the Teen-age Liberation Handbook, Mike Males and Robert Epstein. Some warriors, especially Therapist, will speculate on the roots of Yippie's hostility towards adults; it could be gestapo parents, or it could be an incident in which he was suspended without due process, or it could be an arrest after a long interrogation kick-started by youth profiling.
Zoanthrope
Zoanthrope enjoys acting out the part of some member of the animal kingdom, and flavors as many of her statements as possible with the role-playing of her favorite bird or beast. Once you brush whiskers with someone whose username is "Kit-E-Kat", for instance, you will soon find her fantasizing over hot "tomcats" and socializing with other forum members by throwing them some "catnip". At night in her time zone, she will excuse herself by saying she has to "put the kittens to bed". Users should be cautious of doing anything to irk her when she announces she is in "a hissy mood", and if another warrior should do battle with her, Kit-E-Kat will wryly warn him, "Cats have sharp claws". Zoanthropes come in all species, orders and phyla -- dogs, goats, horses, monkeys, anteaters, frogs, flamingoes, sharks, snails, praying mantises -- but they all keep their assumed bestial role, tongue-in-cheek, through even the most serious discussion and most charring flame wars. CAUTION: Some Zoanthropes may in fact be mentally ill, and seriously believe themselves to walk on four legs instead of two. Prudent warriors should avoid getting too deeply invested in battle with these nutcases. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:18 pm
|
|
|
Space Whale
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 2410
Location: Far, far away from wherever you are
|
|
I'm seeing a lot of familiar faces in these siggestions, though I like what I see...
I especially like Cocktail, due to the difference of its introduction to a forum, in that a grenade appears without warning, while a cocktail is introduced under friendly circumstances... _________________ Every person alive lives in their own personal alternate reality.
Good luck trying to get other people into yours. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:05 am
|
|
|
The Cryptkeeper
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: Australia
|
|
I'll have a better look at this when I have the chance in the next couple of days.
A number suggested are original, and even those that have similarities with previous suggestions, do seem to (at this point) capture the warrior well.
All the same - nice. _________________ The important thing is knowing who owns the fence |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:21 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Smite wrote: |
| I'm seeing a lot of familiar faces in these siggestions, though I like what I see... |
Neat!
Care to elaborate on some of the people you've met online who fit these descriptions?
| Quote: |
| I especially like Cocktail, due to the difference of its introduction to a forum, in that a grenade appears without warning, while a cocktail is introduced under friendly circumstances... |
Oh yeah, I think that was one of my best ones. Not all weapons are originally thrown to win a battle. At my writers' board, www.writersbbs.org, people would throw Cocktails when they got bored, and at one point, someone threw a Cocktail about either abortion or creationism vs. evolution (I forget which) and the Admin had to step in several times to get the teens on the board to stop the debate, before finally deleting all one hundred and fifty-odd messages on the topic. I should probably note that this Cocktail was completely off-topic (it was a young adult writing board). |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:18 pm
|
|
|
Abusive Admin
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 6059
Location: The Archive of Fortitude
|
|
Edit: How rude of me. Welcome to the forum! You have some excellent suggestions, but some are covered. Sorry for my earlier hastiness, but I was multitasking. I am also making cookies.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Amnesiac |
This is Lemming, except more specific about one tactic.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Big Monkey |
I've seen this before (though it is a new suggestion), but what does he do in a fight? What makes this a flame warrior definition and not just a netzien?
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Broken Record |
Same situation as Big Monkey.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Cocktail |
New and I love it.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Curtain-closer |
Nanny
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Debate Club |
We've got a lot of suggestions like this. Debaters come up a lot due to their tendency to turn into bitter Tireless Rebutters, Philosophers, and such.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Epicophobe |
New, I think.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Gerrymander |
I think this a Nitpick using the Playing Caesar tactic. Could you elaborate on how s/he establishes the authority to do this?
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| The Grey Menace |
This appears to be a Fence Sitter. I have no link to the definition due to it being among Fence Sitter's archive of horrors.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Hitler Youth |
Troglodyte
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Life Experience |
A very specific example of a Pinnacle.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| The Lone Ranter |
Fly-By-Night
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Martian |
Sounds extremely similar to Inert Mass.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Mirrors |
The Swarm
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Paycheck |
Proleteriat
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Polysemist |
An Artful Dodger, though more narrowed down
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Scavenger |
Possibly new, but it kind of reminds me of Back-Biter.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Source-staller |
I think this is new but it sounds familiar.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Yippie |
Seems like a young Pinko.
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Zoanthrope |
Examples of Nom de Guerre _________________
Tireless Rebutter / Archivist
The Grand Suggestion List |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:49 am
|
|
|
The Cryptkeeper
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: Australia
|
|
I did promise to have a better look, but totally forgot about the weekend arriving. (oh bugger, too late to do anything tonight, but I'm going to have to get offline as the next couple of days are / should be busy)
iritus has pretty much gone through it.
(It would have taken me a good deal of time to try and think my way though the list at the moment. My memory of the various things has waned of late, though I'm hopeful that all will improve in the next few weeks. )
I love the Epicophobe suggestion.
Big monkey reminds me of Clown (Inferred via Evil Clown)
A Broken Record type was discussed somewhere I thought, something like Repeter but ...
The Grey Menace is a type of Fence Sitter. I've talked about this type, but not as a Suggestion. I can hardly remember the one listed in the Crypt, but it was a very limited version from memory- ie it sucked or I wasn't happy with the definition. Fence Sitting takes many forms.
(Yes, yes, I should go through and pull out and refine, if required, notable suggestions from the crypt.)
Scavenger is similar to Last Word (hey I'm not sure what the exact suggestion tittle is), but this type with a specific purpose to feast on dead threads. I think something similar was talked about at length, a result of A_B being fairly persistent.
Source-staller is new I think in todays sense. The net used to be, (as I remember it,) pretty formal and serious, and yeah, you were expected to be able to site sources if something was claimed as fact and not merely an opinion. Thesedays it could be seen as a form of Dodging though, though that is not their intent at all.
Hey!! that reminded me of something somewhat similar - twits I call an Unqualified Skeptic (this isn't in any of the suggestions yet, or have I just forgotten?) _________________ The important thing is knowing who owns the fence |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:12 pm
|
|
|
The Voice of Reason
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 1368
|
|
Scavenger seems like a specific necromancer type to me. _________________ I've got good news:
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance by NOT BUYING ANY. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:15 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| irritus wrote: |
| Edit: How rude of me. Welcome to the forum! You have some excellent suggestions, but some are covered. Sorry for my earlier hastiness, but I was multitasking. I am also making cookies. |
It looks as if I'm going to love this place! Thanks for welcoming me in here.
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Big Monkey |
I've seen this before (though it is a new suggestion), but what does he do in a fight? What makes this a flame warrior definition and not just a netzien?
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Broken Record |
Same situation as Big Monkey. |
I've never seen someone start a fight with Big Monkey, so I wouldn't be able to tell. Maybe someone can experiment the next time one pops up at the Fourth Turning board. However, there are some warrior types who do not seem to participate in battle. Bong, Hyuk Hyuk and Pithy Phrase come to mind.
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Cocktail |
New and I love it. |
Thank you! That makes two people who really liked Cocktail. Seems there are only a handful of weapons used that aren't a direct extension of someone's warrior technique. Ever get another weapon suggestion?
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Curtain-closer |
Nanny |
It seems closer to Netiquette Nazi to me. If I had to place it as an entry on Smite's list I would call it a Netiquette Nazi type. The key trait that distinguishes Curtain-closer from Nanny and Netiquette Nazi is that she uses the dramatic tone of posts to discredit her opponent in battle.
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Gerrymander |
I think this a Nitpick using the Playing Caesar tactic. Could you elaborate on how s/he establishes the authority to do this? |
Generally Gerrymanders derive their authority from the fact that they already feel they are way superior to their opponent. If Gerrymander is also Life Experience, he will use his age as a basis to assume that he wears the pants in this battle.
Typical Hitler Youths in real life do things like wear preppy clothes and enjoy classical music, which are not things Trogloeytes would do. Troglodyte also uses epithets like "hairy-leg lesbo feminist" and "tree hugger", while Hitler Youth does not talk like this (unless he turns out to be Enfant Provocateur in disguise; this is a popular mask for Enfant Provocateur for some reason, although they also try impersonating Yippie). Hitler Youth perseveres to make himself look a cut above the rest, while Troglodye reaches for the image of an "average person".
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Martian |
Sounds extremely similar to Inert Mass. |
I don't see the relation between the two. Could you explain how they are similar?
Members of the Swarm use their sheer numbers to win the battle. With Mirrors, on the other hand, it is not their numbers but their confusability and interchangeability that helps them win. When an opponent confuses them, they use it to discredit him or her. Mirrors do not have to belong to a forum's dominant ideology, and they do not even have to be numerous, in fact there could theoretically be as few as two Mirrors.
Wow! I read that description and Proletariat is dead-on! That guest nailed Paycheck! If Mike L. Reed uses the type, we may want to cannibalize the two suggestion posts. Although that still leaves the question of which name to use, Paycheck or Proletariat.
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Polysemist |
An Artful Dodger, though more narrowed down |
You're right, it does sound a lot like Artful Dodger. Since this is such a popular tactic, we should revise Artful Dodger to include this:
Artful Dodger is a nimble and elusive Warrior. When strongly attacked he changes the subject with a diversionary counterattack. For example, if in a moment of pique his opponent refers to him to him as a "sonofabitch", Artful Dodger will not only demand a public apology for the insult to his own mother, but launch into a long harangue about the sanctity of motherhood. One of his preferred tactics is to disingenuously misinterpret words that have more than one meaning. Should an opponent, for instance, thinking him odd, say that something about him is "queer", Artful Dodger will stand up to aver his heterosexuality and attempt to win the battle with threats of a libel suit for insinuating that he was gay. Knowing full well that staying on topic works to his disadvantage, Artful Dodger will not allow himself to be pinned down.
| Quote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Source-staller |
I think this is new but it sounds familiar. |
Source-stallers are some of my least favorite warriors. If it sounds familiar, that's probably because you've seen one yourself and considered making a new Warrior type for her. It should be a good addition. Wish someone could come up with a better name, though.
Thanks for showing me Nom de Guerre. Animals seem to be a particular favorite type.
I notice you created a lot of the warrior suggestions (Lemming, Inert Mass, Playing Caesar . . .) They seemed to cover a lot of different things and a broad ground, which sometimes made it hard to tell if it matched my warrior. Your writing style, Irritus, is of the more impressionistic type than mine. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:25 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Fence Sitter wrote: |
| I love the Epicophobe suggestion. |
Thanks. If I make a signature I'll be sure to mention Epicophobe along with Cocktail. I've battled on a forum with multiple Epicophobes and they are INFURIATING. I wonder how one would respond to one of Artful Dodger's excogitations?
| Quote: |
| Big monkey reminds me of Clown (Inferred via Evil Clown) |
He's clowny, but less evil. Yep. As a matter of fact, we had a Big Monkey named Bobo on the Fourth Turning eorum (a forum about generations in history) once who started a thread called "Generations and Clowns". His introductory post read "What changes in clownship can we see with the generations and turnings in this century and the last? Is Bozo a Boomer clown? Discuss here."
| Quote: |
The Grey Menace is a type of Fence Sitter. I've talked about this type, but not as a Suggestion. I can hardly remember the one listed in the Crypt, but it was a very limited version from memory- ie it sucked or I wasn't happy with the definition. Fence Sitting takes many forms.
(Yes, yes, I should go through and pull out and refine, if required, notable suggestions from the crypt.) |
Interesting. What other types of Fence Sitter have you seen?
| Quote: |
Source-staller is new I think in todays sense. The net used to be, (as I remember it,) pretty formal and serious, and yeah, you were expected to be able to site sources if something was claimed as fact and not merely an opinion. These days it could be seen as a form of Dodging though, though that is not their intent at all.
Hey!! that reminded me of something somewhat similar - twits I call an Unqualified Skeptic (this isn't in any of the suggestions yet, or have I just forgotten?) |
If you find any older Source-staller suggestions, tell me. I hate battling Source-stallers because some things are such common sense that no one would bother to conduct formal studies to confirm them. I've found myself attacking their cowardly source-stalling technique itself rather than then focusing my energy on proving my claims. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:59 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Quote: |
|
Same situation as Big Monkey. |
I've never seen someone start a fight with Big Monkey, so I wouldn't be able to tell. Maybe someone can experiment the next time one pops up at the Fourth Turning board. |
Then we know each other. I'm The Pervert over there. What's your handle? _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:18 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Fence Sitter wrote: |
| I love the Epicophobe suggestion. |
Thanks. If I make a signature I'll be sure to mention Epicophobe along with Cocktail. I've battled on a forum with multiple Epicophobes and they are INFURIATING. I wonder how one would respond to one of Artful Dodger's excogitations? |
A younger-sounding moniker for epicophobe would be "Too Long, Didn't Read" or "TL;DR," an expression that probably originated on LiveJournal and is regularly used as an expression of dismissal for long posts.
So, was this T4T where you had this problem and, if so, which person on T4T did you have in mind for this? The Rani?
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Big monkey reminds me of Clown (Inferred via Evil Clown) |
He's clowny, but less evil. Yep. As a matter of fact, we had a Big Monkey named Bobo on the Fourth Turning eorum (a forum about generations in history) once who started a thread called "Generations and Clowns". His introductory post read "What changes in clownship can we see with the generations and turnings in this century and the last? Is Bozo a Boomer clown? Discuss here." |
This is a Troller tactic. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:18 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
Then we know each other. I'm The Pervert over there. What's your handle? |
I posted under my real name, James E. F. Landau. I haven't visited in a while. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:24 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Fence Sitter wrote: |
| I love the Epicophobe suggestion. |
Thanks. If I make a signature I'll be sure to mention Epicophobe along with Cocktail. I've battled on a forum with multiple Epicophobes and they are INFURIATING. I wonder how one would respond to one of Artful Dodger's excogitations? |
A younger-sounding moniker for epicophobe would be "Too Long, Didn't Read" or "TL;DR," an expression that probably originated on LiveJournal and is regularly used as an expression of dismissal for long posts.
So, was this T4T where you had this problem and, if so, which person on T4T did you have in mind for this? The Rani?
|
Thanks for the interesting bit about TL;DR. The board on which I had this problem was not T4T, but the oh-so-intelligent-and-civilized Teleboards. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:36 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
Then we know each other. I'm The Pervert over there. What's your handle? |
I posted under my real name, James E. F. Landau. I haven't visited in a while. |
Oh, hi! Good to see you again!
In that case, you probably know the person I suggested as "Xer of Evil" or "Witchipoo." She changes her handle there almost as often as she changes boyfriends. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:05 am
|
|
|
The Cryptkeeper
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: Australia
|
|
going to have to get off in a few minutes so just a quick responce.
| Quote: |
| He's clowny, but less evil |
I thought you described someone larking about. Something like this
When it's playful they could be a Clown type. (The type is inferred as it's the Evil Clown that gets a mention because they have an intent to stir the pot and cause trouble.) Of couse as Neon mentions, it can be considered a Troller tactic.
Fence Sitter types
(Ah my favourite from the Urban site seems to have been removed, it described the mongrel type.)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fence-sitter
| Code: |
fence-sitter 6 up, 3 down
(n.) One who is afraid to have an opinion, and rather, simply points out the flaws of what everyone else is saying. Dislikeable to all. The exceptions are those fence-sitters that really don't give a shit and make fun of everything, who are liked by all.
A political moderate or an agnostic
by Gumba Gumba May 13, 2004 email it
|
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fence+sitting
| Code: |
fence sitting 7 up, 1 down
Fence sitting, sitting on the fence, sitting on a fence, are all terms for someone who refuses to make a decision. Usually it describes someone who will not take a stand on two very defined and clearly opposing options/opinions. This can be both good and bad.
[i]Clair was angry that Mandy occasionally used drugs; Mandy thought drug use should be legal. Angela was neither for nor against it, and sat on the fence about it, instead trying to calm her friends down.
The politician, when questioned on abortion, sat on the fence, never giving a clear opinion; he was afraid of losing support from the right or the left.[/i]
by JZ Jun 15, 2004 email it
|
The mongrel type went something like;
Fence sitter - Mongrels who don't sides, until such time it is apparent which side will win and they immediately move / mold their opinion towards
said side.
It's not real fitting to what a true Fence Sitter does though.
Fence Sitting is defined by being either neutral or undecided in opinion.
I see it as approaching something with a bit of balance.
However, it also covers those who argue that they are "no sides", just people taking an element of the complex issue which has a broad range, and then placing emphisis on the variation. Obviously, sometimes it is about making a stand, pointing out within the discussion that the extreme views are unrealistic.
Ok some of that isn't making much sense to me now, but I'm very exhausted and tired, so night all. _________________ The important thing is knowing who owns the fence |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:46 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
I think Xer of Evil would be Evil Clown.
Can you think of any 4Ters who match my warrior types (besides the Big Monkeys)? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:42 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Why didn't the umlauted character in "Martin Niemöller" post correctly? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:56 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| I think Xer of Evil would be Evil Clown. |
Yes, but she's also a Strumpet. I can easily play Perv and distract her.
| Quote: |
| Can you think of any 4Ters who match my warrior types (besides the Big Monkeys)? |
That's a good challenge. Let's see...
Kiff occasionally uses Curtain Closer techniques, even if that's not what she usually does.
I'm sure that there's a Debate Club or two there, but I can't name one off the top of my head.
Right now, there's a Monarchist called Sean '90 who would make for a good Hitler Youth. That type is too cultured to be a Troglodyte, but would make for a good Ideologue or Capitalista when they grow up. However, Sean '90s views are so far out that he could also be a Martian.
There are a couple of older posters who could certainly do Life Experience, but they have more brains than that.
We rarely have Lone Ranters there, at least in the sense of dropping in and leaving soon after. There is one bonafide Tinfoil Hat wearing Loopy, and a few long-winded cranks, but they have been there a long time.
Mirrors would be a good one in a place like Free Republic, but debate on T4T is still too intelligent for a group to use that technique in an obvious manner.
Paycheck/Proletariat--that would be an interesting one to have at T4T, but I can't think of anyone who is that primary type. Now, I know a bunch of those on rec.arts.marching.drumcorps. They are natural allies of Troglodyte, even if they really don't share the latter's views.
There is a lot of Scavenging on T4T. Necromancy is, in fact, quite tolerated there.
Source-stalling? That's a tactic that I've seen there, and it usually backfires. Don't ever try to source-stall a Philosopher and T4T has several of them, including my buddy Mike Alexander.
Yippie would be rare on T4T--the Millies and younger Xers there nearly all fit the S&H stereotypes. Millies like their elders and the Xers really don't care.
If you want to see Zoanthrope, visit a Furry forum. As far as I know, there are no Furries on T4T!
Finally, the place is full of cocktails! _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Quote: |
Right now, there's a Monarchist called Sean '90 who would make for a good Hitler Youth. That type is too cultured to be a Troglodyte, but would make for a good Ideologue or Capitalista when they grow up. |
You're right that Hitler Youth don't make good Troglodytes.
What about Michael Eliason? He definitely fits the Hitler Youth profile, in fact he was my prototype in writing the Hitler Youth description. He'd often say that he "wasn't fond of" American Pie when discussing teen movies, or "wasn't fond of" cargo pants when we were discussing what kind of pants teens wear.
| Quote: |
| There are a couple of older posters who could certainly do Life Experience, but they have more brains than that. |
Thank God! Maybe it's because the theory says that Millennials are up to be a great generation and they believe they can respect the Millennials. Also, the way the lifecycles work in the theory prevents adults from being able to say, "You'll agree with me when you're older".
| Quote: |
| We rarely have Lone Ranters there, at least in the sense of dropping in and leaving soon after. There is one bonafide Tinfoil Hat wearing Loopy, and a few long-winded cranks, but they have been there a long time. |
Eddie Howard had some Lone Ranter traits, but he actually responded to the responses he got.
| Quote: |
| Source-stalling? That's a tactic that I've seen there, and it usually backfires. Don't ever try to source-stall a Philosopher and T4T has several of them, including my buddy Mike Alexander. |
The economist, right?
| Quote: |
| Yippie would be rare on T4T--the Millies and younger Xers there nearly all fit the S&H stereotypes. Millies like their elders and the Xers really don't care. |
What? Most of the posters born 1982 and after are pro-draft, Bush-loving preppy virgins-until-marriage who oppose the legalization of marijuana and adore school uniforms? The forum must have been taken over by Hitler Youth since I left? Too bad John Milens doesn't post there anymore. (I wrote an email to him on 9/11/'01 and he said he didn't post at T4T anymore.)
| Quote: |
| Finally, the place is full of cocktails! |
That's what I would definitely imagine. I remember people starting debates for the purpose of debating from my days there. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:10 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Quote: |
Right now, there's a Monarchist called Sean '90 who would make for a good Hitler Youth. That type is too cultured to be a Troglodyte, but would make for a good Ideologue or Capitalista when they grow up. |
You're right that Hitler Youth don't make good Troglodytes.
What about Michael Eliason? He definitely fits the Hitler Youth profile, in fact he was my prototype in writing the Hitler Youth description. He'd often say that he "wasn't fond of" American Pie when discussing teen movies, or "wasn't fond of" cargo pants when we were discussing what kind of pants teens wear. |
He's long gone. He hasn't posted under that name since 2001 and not under his alias since 2006. On top of which, he wasn't that frequent a poster anyway.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| There are a couple of older posters who could certainly do Life Experience, but they have more brains than that. |
Thank God! Maybe it's because the theory says that Millennials are up to be a great generation and they believe they can respect the Millennials. Also, the way the lifecycles work in the theory prevents adults from being able to say, "You'll agree with me when you're older". |
Exactly. The closest I've seen with Life Experience are the older vets who will tell the younger vets and active duty personnel there off for being gung-ho and wet behind the ears. Most of those are first-wave Xers lecturing the last wave Xers, not the Millies.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| We rarely have Lone Ranters there, at least in the sense of dropping in and leaving soon after. There is one bonafide Tinfoil Hat wearing Loopy, and a few long-winded cranks, but they have been there a long time. |
Eddie Howard had some Lone Ranter traits, but he actually responded to the responses he got. |
I haven't heard that name mentioned in a very long time. I don't think he ever showed up in the post-911 forums.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Source-stalling? That's a tactic that I've seen there, and it usually backfires. Don't ever try to source-stall a Philosopher and T4T has several of them, including my buddy Mike Alexander. |
The economist, right? |
The amateur economist, even if he really is good at what he does. He's really an engineer. FWIW, he's now writing for Daily Kos.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Yippie would be rare on T4T--the Millies and younger Xers there nearly all fit the S&H stereotypes. Millies like their elders and the Xers really don't care. |
What? Most of the posters born 1982 and after are pro-draft, Bush-loving preppy virgins-until-marriage who oppose the legalization of marijuana and adore school uniforms? The forum must have been taken over by Hitler Youth since I left? Too bad John Milens doesn't post there anymore. (I wrote an email to him on 9/11/'01 and he said he didn't post at T4T anymore.) |
No, they're still pretty left-leaning. It's just that the older generations there have pretty much turned left also, so that the Millies don't have a bunch of older folks to distrust. They do, however, laugh at the Boomers behind their backs, more for their manners than for their politics.
Oddly enough, other than Virgil Saari, the conservatives, both young and old, are all the most obnoxious ones at that site. A few of the regulars here have checked out Marc Lamb and have him pegged as a Bezark.
If you wanted a Yippie from T4T, you'd have to use Justin '79. We was a Yippie, and an Acne, and a Bong all at once when you were posting. However, he's now married with children and living in Estonia. He's settled down and now posts as Uzi.
I'd forgotten about Milens.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Finally, the place is full of cocktails! |
That's what I would definitely imagine. I remember people starting debates for the purpose of debating from my days there. |
Still like that. Some things don't change. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:57 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
| On top of which, he wasn't that frequent a poster anyway. |
Michael Eliason seemed to be one of the big posters reading the posts back from 1997. I recall a long flame war in which S&H were egging Michael on in arguing against the legalization of marijuana.
| Quote: |
Exactly. The closest I've seen with Life Experience are the older vets who will tell the younger vets and active duty personnel there off for being gung-ho and wet behind the ears. Most of those are first-wave Xers lecturing the last wave Xers, not the Millies. |
Maybe someday you'll see a Life Experience/Centurion hybrid.
There are a number of poster types who use their situation for authoritativeness, chest-beating and well-poisoning:
Life Experience
Centurion
Paycheck
Ethnix
Toxic Granny
Yippie
These form one cluster of warrior types. There are other clusters, such as the political types (Ideologue. Troglodyte, Weenie, Pinko, Capitalista, Hitler Youth, BEZARK) are the collective types (Cyber Sisters, Swarm, Mirrors, Howlers).
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
What? Most of the posters born 1982 and after are pro-draft, Bush-loving preppy virgins-until-marriage who oppose the legalization of marijuana and adore school uniforms? The forum must have been taken over by Hitler Youth since I left? Too bad John Milens doesn't post there anymore. (I wrote an email to him on 9/11/'01 and he said he didn't post at T4T anymore.) |
No, they're still pretty left-leaning. It's just that the older generations there have pretty much turned left also, so that the Millies don't have a bunch of older folks to distrust. |
Ah, I see. I've read posts back to when it was predominantly right-leaning, with posters like Michael Eliason, Lis Libengood and Paul Beavers.
| Quote: |
| They do, however, laugh at the Boomers behind their backs, more for their manners than for their politics. |
Things like the way Marc Lamb conducts himself in a debate?
| Quote: |
| Oddly enough, other than Virgil Saari, the conservatives, both young and old, are all the most obnoxious ones at that site. |
But Virgil's a paleoconservative, not a true conservative, right?
| Quote: |
| If you wanted a Yippie from T4T, you'd have to use Justin '79. We was a Yippie, and an Acne, and a Bong all at once when you were posting. However, he's now married with children and living in Estonia. He's settled down and now posts as Uzi. |
That guy? Wow. I never expected that a fellow 1979 cohort would settle eown so quickly. It actually surprises me when I see late 1970's cohorts married. Back in the 1980's married twentysomethings didn't surprise me. I also pictured thirtysomethings as family people in 1990, while I don't picture thirtysomethings as family people today. But then again, that was before I knew about generations.
I also remember Justin's contempt for anyone born since 1982.
I peg myself as Yippie, Archivist, Issues and Tireless Rebutter.
| Quote: |
I'd forgotten about Milens. |
I wrote an email to Milens on September 11, 2001 asking him if he thought now everyone born since 1982 was going to love Bush and serve their country in a scoutlike manner in war. He said no, and added that if that was a veiled way of asking whether 9/11 was the start of the Fourth Turning, he believed it wasn't. He likened the government and public reaction to 9/11 to World War I. I wrote back that I didn't believe this was the Catalyst either, with the primary reason being that the reaction to the attack was completely event-driven.
John said he hadn't been on the board lately, and I hadn't either. Certain posters, especially Robert Reed and Susan Brombacher, were sounding more and more like Martians in their assessment of the societal mood and it was becoming harder and harder to dig up material to refute their posts. I procrastinated going through the fora and posting my rebuttals, then I procrastinated longer until eventually I just stopped going to the board. Robert was overeager to declare Xers as settled down and mere shadows of their former wild selves, and asked "What happened to the counterculture?" when it was all around me. In particular I remember Susan's complaints in late 2000 that music had become bland. Hello? What was bland about "Californication", or "Teenage Dirtbag", or "All the Small Things", or "Stan", or "Adam's Song", or "Pardon Me"? I even stopped corresponding with Chris Loyd in email.
So are you still posting articles to T4T? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
| On top of which, he wasn't that frequent a poster anyway. |
Michael Eliason seemed to be one of the big posters reading the posts back from 1997. I recall a long flame war in which S&H were egging Michael on in arguing against the legalization of marijuana. |
I joined the board in Summer 2000 under my real name, which is related to "Neon Vincent." I missed anything that happened much before that, as I didn't feel like trudging my way through all the old posts except David McGuiness's histories of the Ancient and Medieval Near East and Europe. Those were fascinating, even if they were fringe. Turns out he's probably right. Michael Alexander was able to confirm most of the Classical and Medieval turnings independently using data from economics, revolts, and religious awakenings.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Exactly. The closest I've seen with Life Experience are the older vets who will tell the younger vets and active duty personnel there off for being gung-ho and wet behind the ears. Most of those are first-wave Xers lecturing the last wave Xers, not the Millies. |
Maybe someday you'll see a Life Experience/Centurion hybrid. |
Already have. Capt. Mike Eagen USN Ret. is exactly that combination. He's on a generational mailing list that I moderate, one that used to be moderated by Frank Gregorsky of millennials.com.
| Quote: |
There are a number of poster types who use their situation for authoritativeness, chest-beating and well-poisoning:
Life Experience
Centurion
Paycheck
Ethnix
Toxic Granny
Yippie
These form one cluster of warrior types. There are other clusters, such as the political types (Ideologue. Troglodyte, Weenie, Pinko, Capitalista, Hitler Youth, BEZARK) are the collective types (Cyber Sisters, Swarm, Mirrors, Howlers). |
Note that within each cluster are each type's worst enemies, except for the collective types (BTW, you forgot to include Coffee Klatch in that category). It's rare to see true group on group combat unless one crossposts between different newsgroups, such as can be done on USENET.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
What? Most of the posters born 1982 and after are pro-draft, Bush-loving preppy virgins-until-marriage who oppose the legalization of marijuana and adore school uniforms? The forum must have been taken over by Hitler Youth since I left? Too bad John Milens doesn't post there anymore. (I wrote an email to him on 9/11/'01 and he said he didn't post at T4T anymore.) |
No, they're still pretty left-leaning. It's just that the older generations there have pretty much turned left also, so that the Millies don't have a bunch of older folks to distrust. |
Ah, I see. I've read posts back to when it was predominantly right-leaning, with posters like Michael Eliason, Lis Libengood and Paul Beavers. |
All of whom are long gone. The last one I had contact with was Lis, who was on the mailing list.
No, that forum became patriotic after 911 in addition to quadrupling in size, but then turned anti-Bush during the run-up to the Iraq War. The Liberals, Moderates, Libertarians, and Paleoconservatives all ganged up on the Movement Conservatives, Neoconservatives, and GOP hacks like Marc Lamb and Hopeful Cynic and the board has stayed that way ever since.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| They do, however, laugh at the Boomers behind their backs, more for their manners than for their politics. |
Things like the way Marc Lamb conducts himself in a debate? |
Yes, and the way Brian Rush, Eric Meese, and any other longwinded Boomer Ideologue, Weenie, and Pinko there behaves as well. Speaking of Marc Lamb, within a month of his showing up on T4T, I emailed Mike Alexander, with whom I've been friends offline since Fall 2000, and asked him "Is it just me, or is Marc an asshole?" Mike's response was "He seems pretty rectal to me."
Believe it or not, Marc, who is now zilch, has gotten even worse than he was when you were posting and reading. The software the forum now uses (Invision) allows people to ignore other users. I've done exactly that with Marc, which makes him the first person I've ever killfiled. He'll still post insults to me, including links to the very first post I ever made as "The Pervert" on that board, even though he knows I'm not reading him.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Oddly enough, other than Virgil Saari, the conservatives, both young and old, are all the most obnoxious ones at that site. |
But Virgil's a paleoconservative, not a true conservative, right? |
He's a paleoconservative, I'll grant you that. As to whether that makes him not a true conservative, I'll leave that one alone.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| If you wanted a Yippie from T4T, you'd have to use Justin '79. We was a Yippie, and an Acne, and a Bong all at once when you were posting. However, he's now married with children and living in Estonia. He's settled down and now posts as Uzi. |
That guy? Wow. I never expected that a fellow 1979 cohort would settle eown so quickly. It actually surprises me when I see late 1970's cohorts married. Back in the 1980's married twentysomethings didn't surprise me. I also pictured thirtysomethings as family people in 1990, while I don't picture thirtysomethings as family people today. But then again, that was before I knew about generations.
I also remember Justin's contempt for anyone born since 1982. |
Now that he has two children, all that contempt has gone away.
| Quote: |
| I peg myself as Yippie, Archivist, Issues and Tireless Rebutter. |
I'm a bit of a Jekyll and Hyde, although not someone who is nice and then melts down unexpectedly. My dark side is more controlled than that, as I'm a Perv and a Picador alternating with Eagle Scout, Philosopher, and Therapist.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
I'd forgotten about Milens. |
I wrote an email to Milens on September 11, 2001 asking him if he thought now everyone born since 1982 was going to love Bush and serve their country in a scoutlike manner in war. He said no, and added that if that was a veiled way of asking whether 9/11 was the start of the Fourth Turning, he believed it wasn't. He likened the government and public reaction to 9/11 to World War I. I wrote back that I didn't believe this was the Catalyst either, with the primary reason being that the reaction to the attack was completely event-driven. |
He ended up being mostly right. That was a WWI like event that happened in the equivalent of the late 20s instead of the mid to late teens. Because of the timing of the event close to the turning boundary, there has been almost constant turmoil since then, so the turning marker is going to be obscured. FWIW, the consensus is that the fourth turning has finally arrived with Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans. People are expecting the regeneracy with the 2008 election.
As for the Millies, they seem to have turned against Bush.
| Quote: |
| John said he hadn't been on the board lately, and I hadn't either. Certain posters, especially Robert Reed and Susan Brombacher, were sounding more and more like Martians in their assessment of the societal mood and it was becoming harder and harder to dig up material to refute their posts. I procrastinated going through the fora and posting my rebuttals, then I procrastinated longer until eventually I just stopped going to the board. Robert was overeager to declare Xers as settled down and mere shadows of their former wild selves, and asked "What happened to the counterculture?" when it was all around me. In particular I remember Susan's complaints in late 2000 that music had become bland. Hello? What was bland about "Californication", or "Teenage Dirtbag", or "All the Small Things", or "Stan", or "Adam's Song", or "Pardon Me"? I even stopped corresponding with Chris Loyd in email. |
Robert Reed is still posting to T4T. He's on my mailing list. Chris Loyd is no longer on T4T, but he's also on my mailing list. As for Susan, well, she decided she'd rather chase much younger men than stick around on T4T.
| Quote: |
| So are you still posting articles to T4T? |
Oh, yes, as "The Pervert." I've turned into the board's friendly troll. The regulars know I will be serious with them and make substantive posts, but I'll troll the trolls when they annoy the old timers. It's fun. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:52 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
I joined the board in Summer 2000 under my real name, which is related to "Neon Vincent." I missed anything that happened much before that, as I didn't feel like trudging my way through all the old posts . . .
|
Well, there was some conservatism and drumming up hype about the Millennials being poised to turn out to be a conservative generation from Lis, Michael E. and Paul. And there was liberalism from Eric Alan Meece and Brian Rush, with Ben Weiss, Angeli and Theresa 13er being the main liberal Xers. Chris Loyd covered the Millennials with a scientist's perspective. Astrology and Star Wars would be discussed every now and then.
On Flag Day of 1999 William Strauss had an interview with a boy born in 1982 and posted it on the site. In the interview he interpreted Columbine as the result as X-like outcasts being outnumbered and jocks replacing goths/freaks as the dominant group in high schools. There were factual errors in this, the interview being an example of what can happen when you let the Howe & Strauss theory get in the way of other things. Among other problems with the interview, Columbine had been the "jock school" for decades. with its football championships and general exaltation of jockdom, even though Strauss tried to convince us that Columbine was a goth school before the Class of 2000 got there.
I made a long and angsty post objecting to some of the things Strauss said, and divided the forum. Josh Braxon (a 1978 cohort) admitted that he often has problems seeing the theory being applied to reality, and Ben Weiss posted a "Holes in the theory" thread. Jake '78 criticized my Yippieishness, flamed me in three posts in that thread, and then was never seen again. The board was divided into those who believed the Millennials were (or would turn out to be) conservative straight-arrows just as the authors predicted and those who believed they were less dissimilar to Xers (or to 60's Boomers, for that matter) than the theory said they were supposed to be.
Robert Reed joined soon afterwards. Later John Milens joined the board and he openly rejected the idea of Millennials as being conservative, totalitarian or authoritarian. He often made fun of the theory's take on Millennials, and sometimes made fun of the Religious Right too.
Then you came.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Maybe someday you'll see a Life Experience/Centurion hybrid. |
Already have. Capt. Mike Eagen USN Ret. is exactly that combination. He's on a generational mailing list that I moderate, one that used to be moderated by Frank Gregorsky of millennials.com. |
Ah. I know him. We once got into a big flame war after he learned that I didn't vote.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
There are a number of poster types who use their situation for authoritativeness, chest-beating and well-poisoning:
Life Experience
Centurion
Paycheck
Ethnix
Toxic Granny
Yippie
These form one cluster of warrior types. There are other clusters, such as the political types (Ideologue. Troglodyte, Weenie, Pinko, Capitalista, Hitler Youth, BEZARK) and the collective types (Cyber Sisters, Swarm, Mirrors, Howlers). |
Note that within each cluster are each type's worst enemies, except for the collective types (BTW, you forgot to include Coffee Klatch in that category). It's rare to see true group on group combat unless one crossposts between different newsgroups, such as can be done on USENET. |
Duly noted.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| I wrote an email to Milens on September 11, 2001 asking him if he thought now everyone born since 1982 was going to love Bush and serve their country in a scoutlike manner in war. He said no, and added that if that was a veiled way of asking whether 9/11 was the start of the Fourth Turning, he believed it wasn't. He likened the government and public reaction to 9/11 to World War I. I wrote back that I didn't believe this was the Catalyst either, with the primary reason being that the reaction to the attack was completely event-driven. |
He ended up being mostly right. That was a WWI like event that happened in the equivalent of the late 20s instead of the mid to late teens. Because of the timing of the event close to the turning boundary, there has been almost constant turmoil since then, so the turning marker is going to be obscured. FWIW, the consensus is that the fourth turning has finally arrived with Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans. People are expecting the regeneracy with the 2008 election. |
Weather instead of politics as a turning marker? That'd be something new to the theory . . .
Well, at least John and I knew it wasn't the start of the Fourth Turning. That all has to do with how different generations experienced things on September, 11, I suppose. Although I don't post at that site anymore, I did write an article about how the different generations dealt with 9/11. The article is here: http://forums.youthrights.org/showthread.php?t=8660
| Quote: |
As for the Millies, they seem to have turned against Bush.
|
Not surprising, since I've never seen the Millennial Generation (or the Bittersweet Generation, as I call them) liking the prezadunt. During the 2000 campaign season they were uninspired by both Bush and Gore. They also failed to "get behind" the president in the aftermath of September 11. Despite Bush's position that drugs (even cocaine!) should remain illegal, for instance, a PRIDE study that covered 2001 to 2002 found drug use by eighth-graders increasing 41% and high school seniors increasing 8%. They question his intelligence, his (dis)honesty and his stances on issues from homosexuality to global warming. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:52 pm
|
|
|
My IQ is 403
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 69
|
|
None of these exist, there is no such thing. _________________ Bring me back to the index |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:31 pm
|
|
|
Space Whale
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 2410
Location: Far, far away from wherever you are
|
|
| Stone Deaf wrote: |
| None of these exist, there is no such thing. |
Get off the Suggestions forum, gimmic. _________________ Every person alive lives in their own personal alternate reality.
Good luck trying to get other people into yours. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:09 pm
|
|
|
My IQ is 403
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 69
|
|
These come no where near existing. As such there are no similar personalities either. _________________ Bring me back to the index |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:03 am
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Anything you have to add, Pervert? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:49 am
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Anything you have to add, Pervert? |
Yeah, but not right now. I'm waiting for the Mod battle and invasion of the gimmick socks to finish playing themselves out. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:58 pm
|
|
|
Clueless Newb
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 24
|
|
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Anything you have to add, Pervert? |
Yeah, but not right now. I'm waiting for the Mod battle and invasion of the gimmick socks to finish playing themselves out. |
I meant, anything new about the Fourth Turning forum? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:50 pm
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 641
Location: The Comics Pages of Playboy
|
|
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Neon Vincent wrote: |
| Anarchivist wrote: |
| Anything you have to add, Pervert? |
Yeah, but not right now. I'm waiting for the Mod battle and invasion of the gimmick socks to finish playing themselves out. |
I meant, anything new about the Fourth Turning forum? |
That's what I meant, too. I have lots to say, but right now my mind is not cooperating. _________________ "Sometimes it's more important to have the right enemies than it is to have the right friends. In those cases, if you make the right enemies, you'll make the right friends."--Original. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT - 6 Hours |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|